Descartes And The Existence Of a Supreme Being :: essays research papers

Upon cursory examination, one major power assume that Rene Descartes is a & angstrom8220non-believer in the worldly concern of a heavenly being, a God that presides over humans and gives us faith. However, this is simply not the case &8211 Descartes is simply trying to demolish all of the uncertainties that have come rough by the attempted scientific explanations of such(prenominal) a supreme being. For Rene Descartes and all of the other believers in the world, the macrocosm of God provides a convenient answer to unexplained questions, while never providing answers to the questions about God himself. This is evidenced a great deal in the circular contention made by Descartes in the Meditations on starting line Philosophy. What follows is a brief account of the troika and fifth meditations, which provide Descartes&8217 response to the masked question, &8220What is God?     Can one embrace or confirm the existence of an conceit that is external to him, an idea such as God? In order to determine the answer we essential start by understanding the ways in which we can fill up an intentions&8217 existence. Descartes explains three ways in which a person might come to such a conclusion &8211 the first, through record the second, through feeling a value that is independent of the will of the object and the third, the objective reality of an idea, or the &8220cause and effect profile. The third point is the one that we will primarily spend our time with.     Descartes drills us with the idea that an object will have an effect when it stems from a legitimate cause, or an initial idea that precedes with equal or superior properties in one&8217s intellect. In other words, the mind generates thoughts and ideas about a physical form, and develops a reality for this form, through previous outline and beliefs.&8220And although an idea may give rise to another idea, this fixation cannot, neverth eless, be infinite we must in the end reach a first idea, the cause of which is, as it were, the archetype in which all the reality that is found objectively in these ideas is contained formally.The only problem with Descartes&8217 argument is when the existence of God arises as a notion, for there is no livelihood or idea for the notion of God to originate from. Is it possible, then, to create the idea of a finite being from an infinite existence, outside of the physical and mental, in a state all of it&8217s own?