Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary

There has been a long contention about the Constitutionality of paid military chaplains. Is in that location a profound tooshie for such or is it a mere supposition? Does the g overnment feature a rule-governed and legitimate basis to pay chaplains for their function or is it doing so just because and is getting away with it? Could it be legally challenged and through with(p) away with? These ar the questions. The First Amendment of the Bill of Rights to the United States Constitution is the legal basis of the military chaplaincy. Here is how.The First Amendment states sexual congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free work out thereof or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press or the right of the people pacifically to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The amendment is generally viewed as be composed of two separate clauses the Establishment Clause and the Free make for Clause. Each of these clauses is designed to protect those fundamental homosexual rights which be so foundational to the ideals of our nation life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.There are m any references to the military chaplaincies as legitimate exceptions to the Establishment Clause because they provide the right of free exercise of religion that is equally guaranteed under the First Amendment. It is this most important point that the chaplaincy clearly provides the military with a constitutional function, the free exercise of religion. The legal debate over paid chaplains sits on both clauses of the First Amendment 1) Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, 2) or prohibiting the free exercise thereofDescribe your understanding of beging in Jesus Name. I cave in been fortunate in that I be in possession of not experienced any direct pressure in regards to praying in Jesus name. However, during public collection in which soldiers are required to be in attendance, I evermore make the arguing As I pray in my tradition, I encourage you to prayer in yours. This should be a common statement among chaplains. Generally speaking, it is not soldiers of other faith traditions that are offended by prayers in Jesusname, it is usually soldiers of no faith tradition whatsoever.Furthermore, although there are stories of religious persecution on both sides of the issue (Religious soldiers and Non- Religious soldiers), these issues have a tendency to be very allocated and reflect the particular direction environment that the Chaplain is serving under. This is a very troubling issue and the scoop up resolve is the development of a healthy relationship between the Chaplain and the look out over in which the chaplain has the opportunity to advise the commander on these complicated issues. In reality, this can become quite complicated and some commanders have solid views on this topic (on both sides of the argument).Is it worth derailing many years of representing deliveryman to soldiers over the particular views of one commander? I would suggest that sometimes it is prudent to just get in the basket and go over the wall. Finally, I also understand that Chaplains and Chaplain Candidates like myself, that pray Christian prayers should be prepared to hear and support the right of Jewish and Muslim Chaplains to pray in their particular tradition as well. Finally, describe your understanding of the preceptort Ask, Dont reveal Policy and other issues of which you may be concerned.According to the Dont Ask Dont Tell repeal, service members will not be involuntarily separated for observant homosexual conduct. Sexual orientation remains a personal and occult matter. Sexual orientation and lawful homosexual conduct (statements, acts or same-sex marriage) are not a basis for separation, reassignment or special consideration. Sailors may intercommunicate others of their sexual orientation at their own discretion. In fa ct, the part of confession will not ask service members to identify their sexual orientation.The Department of Defense will not collect or maintain information on an individuals sexual orientation. This Department of Defense polity on sexual orientation applies equally to all members of the Active, Reserve, and National concord components of the military. With that being said, what does this mean in relationship to providing worship and directioning services to men and women who can now be open with their lifestyle. Chaplains will pertain to have the very same freedom to practice their religion harmonise to the tenets of their faith.In the context of their religious ministry, chaplains are not required to take actions that are inconsistent with their religious beliefs (e. g. , altering the content of sermons or religious counseling, share a pulpit with other chaplains or modifying forms of prayer or worship). However, when it comes to ministering to soulfulness who is a ho mosexual, I feel that it is the pastors or chaplains duty to do so. The Title pastor suggests two functions of church leadership so designated nurturing and guidance.The nurturing aspect includes the general Christian responsibility of showing shame for others, but his responsibility is accentuated because a pastor must set the example. Pastors or Chaplains must indeed set the example. Homosexual or not, that person who seeks counsel is motionlessness one of Gods children only in a fallen state. Then again, arent we all? We are all still a work in progress. There isnt a human being on this Earth that has defeated sin or manage with sin. So I think some compassion is warranted when it comes to ministering to homosexuals.